Re: lve module taint?

[Rusty Russell]

Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:58:09AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> On 19.09.2012 06:02, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> This is setting a, in my opinion, rather bad precedent.  Next we'll
>> be adding various modules here due to various reasons.

We have, that bridge has already been crossed.  I wasn't asking about
the patch itself.

My question was simply whether the lve module is still claiming to be
GPL without being compliant or not.

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/