Re: [PATCH 3/4] mfd: dbx500: Provide a more accurate smp_twd clock

From: Mike Turquette
Date: Wed Sep 19 2012 - 12:42:32 EST


Quoting Samuel Ortiz (2012-09-19 09:02:51)
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 02:21:30PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > From: Michel Jaouen <michel.jaouen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The local timer clock is based on ARM subsystem clock. This patch
> > obtains a more exact value of that clock by reading PRCMU registers.
> > Using this increases the accuracy of the local timer events.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Rickard Andersson <rickard.andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Michel Jaouen <michel.jaouen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/mfd/dbx500-prcmu-regs.h | 4 +++-
> > include/linux/mfd/dbx500-prcmu.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c b/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c
> > index 4f74529..e7f9539 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c
> > @@ -418,6 +418,9 @@ static struct {
> >
> > static atomic_t ac_wake_req_state = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> >
> > +/* Functions definition */
> > +static void compute_armss_rate(void);
> > +
> I'm not a big fan of forward declarations, but I still applied your patch to
> my for-next branch. Thanks.
>

Samuel,

Not sure if you were Cc'd on the rest of the patches in this series but
after some discussion (see patch #1) I took all four patches into
clk-next, including the MFD change. This was done first week of
September. At this point those patches have shifted into my stable
branch that I have promised not to rebase (for arm-soc dependencies).

Are you OK with me taking this patch through the clk-next branch?

Regards,
Mike

> Cheers,
> Samuel.
>
> --
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/