Re: [PATCH 0/6][RFC] Rework vsyscall to avoid truncation/roundingissue in timekeeping core

[John Stultz]

On 09/18/2012 09:50 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:29:50AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > I believe its mostly historical, but on some architectures that
> > history has become an established ABI, making it technical.
> Fine, but what do you mean by "ABI?" Are you talking about magic
> addresses for functions?
On powerpc, I mean magic addresses where userland can find structures 
that it can use to calculate time.

On ia64 I mean the fsyscall method (which is arch specific).

> Without knowing the dirty details, what I imagine is a jump/branch
> from the arch-specific code into the common implementation.
>
> Can that be done?
In the two cases above, what you suggest unfortunately isn't possible 
(at least to my understanding - arch maintainers jump in to correct me).

With powerpc, there is no arch specific kernel code involved, its just a 
data structure the kernel exports that is accessible to userland. The 
execution logic lives in userland libraries, or sometimes application 
code itself.

With ia64's fsyscall, its a special mode that limits what you can do and 
which registers you access. So you couldn't just jump to other code 
while in that mode.

But maybe someone has a neat idea on how to get around this?

thanks
-john

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/