Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v3.7] trace: Don't declare trace_*_rcuidlefunctions in modules

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 05:20:28PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Ingo,
> > 
> > Josh made a change to the tracing code that affects both the 
> > work Paul McKenney and I are currently doing. At the last 
> > Kernel Summit back in August, Linus said when such a case 
> > exists, it is best to make a separate branch based off of his 
> > tree and place the change there. This way, the repositories 
> > that need to share the change can both pull them in and the 
> > SHA1 will match for both. Whichever branch is pulled in first 
> > by Linus will also pull in the necessary change for the other 
> > branch as well.
> > 
> > I made a separate branch from Linus's v3.6-rc5 (called 
> > tip/perf/rcu) and applied Josh's change to it. Could you 
> > please pull this into perf/core and whatever branch that Paul 
> > needs it in. Or just have Paul pull this change as well.
> 
> Ok, pulled it into tip:core/rcu and then merged core/rcu into 
> perf/core.

And I have rebased on top of tip:core/rcu and removed the exports
as part of the mondo rebase to address Peter's review feedback.

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/