Re: [PATCH 3.6-rc6] cpufreq/powernow-k8: workqueue user shouldn'tmigrate the kworker to another CPU

[Tejun Heo]

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:36:54PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Wouldn't it be much simpler to carve out the piece after
> set_cpus_allowed_ptr(), put it in a sub-function called
> __powernowk8_target() and call it with smp_call_function_single instead
> of defining another work item?
> 
> Would the workqueue code handle that or are there any other issues?

The function grabs a mutex.  smp_call_function wouldn't be too happy
about that.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/