Re: [PATCH] i915: Quirk out disconnected backlight

From: Jani Nikula
Date: Mon Sep 17 2012 - 03:58:59 EST


On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:12 PM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752595
>
> In that bug you mention that the intel backlight sets a bogus max of
> '1' when a backlight isn't present. I saw that too here. Here's the
> offending code:
>
> u32 intel_panel_get_max_backlight(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> u32 max;
>
> max = i915_read_blc_pwm_ctl(dev_priv);
> if (max == 0) {
> /* XXX add code here to query mode clock or hardware clock
> * and program max PWM appropriately.
> */
> pr_warn_once("fixme: max PWM is zero\n");
> return 1;
> }
>
> I used a quirk in my patch, but I could instead change the driver to
> bail here instead of trying to limp along.

Hi Grant, please try v3.6-rc6 that does exactly that with:

commit 28dcc2d60cb570d9f549c329b2f51400553412a1
Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Sep 3 16:25:12 2012 +0300

drm/i915: do not expose a dysfunctional backlight interface to userspace

Does that fix it for you?


BR,
Jani.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/