Re: [RFC] cgroup TODOs

[Tejun Heo]

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:44:39PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I think there currently is too much (broken) flexibility and intent to
> remove it.  That doesn't mean that removeing all flexibility is the
> right direction.  It inherently is a balancing act and I think the
> proposed solution is a reasonable tradeoff.  There's important
> difference between causing full overhead by default for all users and
> requiring some overhead when the use case at hand calls for the
> functionality.

That said, if someone can think of a better solution, I'm all ears.
One thing that *has* to be maintained is that it should be able to tag
a resource in such way that its associated controllers are
identifiable regardless of which task is looking at it.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/