Re: [PATCH REPOST RFC cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems withbroken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Fri Sep 14 2012 - 15:15:27 EST

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:19:06PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> I want oppose it as well, but I believe part of this exercise is to make
> the need to have hierarchy widespread. Warning on the case
> 1st-level-only case helps with that, even if we make more noise than we
> should.
> The reason I supported Tejun's proposal originally, is that I think that
> if we make the wrong amount of noise, being wrong by a surplus is better
> than being wrong by a deficit, in this case.

I think both are valid points and don't think it makes a lot of
difference either way. Michal being the maintainer of the code, I'm
taking his approach for this one.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at