Re: [PATCH 10/10] xen/swiotlb: Depending on after_bootmem is notcorrect.

From: Stefano Stabellini
Date: Fri Sep 14 2012 - 12:11:23 EST


On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> When PCI IOMMUs are initialized it is after after_bootmem but
> before a lot of "other" subsystems are initialized. As such
> the check for after_bootmem is incorrect and we should
> just use a parameter to define whether we are early or late.
>
> This solves this bootup problem:
>
> __ex_table already sorted, skipping sortM
> Initializing CPU#0
> Warning: only able to allocate 1 MB for software IO TLB
> Xen-SWIOTLB: Lowering to 2MB
> Warning: only able to allocate 1 MB for software IO TLB
> Xen-SWIOTLB: Lowering to 2MB
> Warning: only able to allocate 1 MB for software IO TLB
> Xen-SWIOTLB: Lowering to 2MB
> Warning: only able to allocate 1 MB for software IO TLB
> Cannot allocate Xen-SWIOTLB buffer (rc:-12)
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/pci-swiotlb-xen.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 11 ++++++-----
> include/xen/swiotlb-xen.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/pci-swiotlb-xen.c b/arch/x86/xen/pci-swiotlb-xen.c
> index fc0c78f..1608244 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/pci-swiotlb-xen.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/pci-swiotlb-xen.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ int __init pci_xen_swiotlb_detect(void)
> void __init pci_xen_swiotlb_init(void)
> {
> if (xen_swiotlb) {
> - xen_swiotlb_init(1);
> + xen_swiotlb_init(1, true /* early */);
> dma_ops = &xen_swiotlb_dma_ops;
>
> /* Make sure ACS will be enabled */
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ int pci_xen_swiotlb_init_late(void)
> if (xen_swiotlb)
> return 0;
>
> - rc = xen_swiotlb_init(1);
> + rc = xen_swiotlb_init(1, false /* late */);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> index 6f81994..7443e19 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static const char *xen_swiotlb_error(enum xen_swiotlb_err err)
> }
> return "";
> }
> -int __ref xen_swiotlb_init(int verbose)
> +int __ref xen_swiotlb_init(int verbose, bool early)
> {
> unsigned long bytes, order;
> int rc = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ retry:
> /*
> * Get IO TLB memory from any location.
> */
> - if (!after_bootmem)
> + if (early)
> xen_io_tlb_start = alloc_bootmem_pages(PAGE_ALIGN(bytes));
> else {
> #define SLABS_PER_PAGE (1 << (PAGE_SHIFT - IO_TLB_SHIFT))
> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ retry:
> bytes,
> xen_io_tlb_nslabs);
> if (rc) {
> - if (!after_bootmem)
> + if (early)
> free_bootmem(__pa(xen_io_tlb_start), PAGE_ALIGN(bytes));
> else {
> free_pages((unsigned long)xen_io_tlb_start, order);
> @@ -230,7 +230,8 @@ retry:
> goto error;
> }
> start_dma_addr = xen_virt_to_bus(xen_io_tlb_start);
> - if (!after_bootmem)
> + rc = 0;
^
why does this change belong to this patch?


> + if (early)
> swiotlb_init_with_tbl(xen_io_tlb_start, xen_io_tlb_nslabs, verbose);
> else
> rc = swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(xen_io_tlb_start, xen_io_tlb_nslabs);
> @@ -244,7 +245,7 @@ error:
> goto retry;
> }
> pr_err("%s (rc:%d)", xen_swiotlb_error(m_ret), rc);
> - if (!after_bootmem)
> + if (early)
> panic("%s (rc:%d)", xen_swiotlb_error(m_ret), rc);
> else
> free_pages((unsigned long)xen_io_tlb_start, order);
> diff --git a/include/xen/swiotlb-xen.h b/include/xen/swiotlb-xen.h
> index a0db2b7..de8bcc6 100644
> --- a/include/xen/swiotlb-xen.h
> +++ b/include/xen/swiotlb-xen.h
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/swiotlb.h>
>
> -extern int xen_swiotlb_init(int verbose);
> +extern int xen_swiotlb_init(int verbose, bool early);
>
> extern void
> *xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
> --
> 1.7.7.6
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/