Re: [alex.shi@intel.com: Re: [PATCH] UV: fix incorrect tlb flushall issue]

From: Alex Shi
Date: Thu Sep 13 2012 - 20:25:51 EST


On 09/14/2012 05:20 AM, Cliff Wickman wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 05:53:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> Ack?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ingo
>
> Ack.
> But with the adjustment below. The 'end' argument was not declared long.
>
> I tested the patch on a UV.
> It has the effect of either clearing 1 or all TLBs in a cpu.
> I added some debugging to test for the cases when clearing all TLBs is
> overkill, and in practice it happens very seldom.


Thanks a lot for you all!

>
> Sorry I didn't participate in this patch earlier. Jack Steiner was
> copied, I believe. But steiner@xxxxxxx is no longer active. Jack has
> retired -- congratulations to him, but a very big loss to us, both
> professionally and personally.


Congratulations for Jack. :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/