Re: [ Re: [PATCH] UV: fix incorrect tlb flushall issue]

From: Alex Shi
Date: Thu Sep 13 2012 - 20:25:51 EST

On 09/14/2012 05:20 AM, Cliff Wickman wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 05:53:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> Ack?
>> Thanks,
>> Ingo
> Ack.
> But with the adjustment below. The 'end' argument was not declared long.
> I tested the patch on a UV.
> It has the effect of either clearing 1 or all TLBs in a cpu.
> I added some debugging to test for the cases when clearing all TLBs is
> overkill, and in practice it happens very seldom.

Thanks a lot for you all!

> Sorry I didn't participate in this patch earlier. Jack Steiner was
> copied, I believe. But steiner@xxxxxxx is no longer active. Jack has
> retired -- congratulations to him, but a very big loss to us, both
> professionally and personally.

Congratulations for Jack. :)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at