Re: [PATCH REPOST RFC cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems withbroken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Wed Sep 12 2012 - 13:12:21 EST
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 05:49:07PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > While I respect your goal of not warning about any configuration
> > with max_level = 1, I believe the only sane configuration as soon
> > as we get any 2nd-level child is use_hierarchy = 1 for everybody.
> > Everything aside from it should be warned.
> Defintely. And that what the above guarantess, doesn't it?
I'm getting a bit worried that I might not be fully understanding what
your concern is. Can you please elaborate what your worries are and
the transition plan that you have in your mind regarding
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/