Re: [PATCH 01/18] perf test: Remove die() calls

[Namhyung Kim]

On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:03:10 -0700, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:24:33AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> Hi, Arnaldo
>> 
>> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:52:53 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > Just use pr_err() + return -1 and let the other tests run as well and
>> > then the perf's main() exit doing whatever it needs.
>> [snip]
>> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/builtin-test.c
>> > index cf33e50..6ae102e 100644
>> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-test.c
>> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-test.c
>> > @@ -1023,14 +1023,16 @@ static int __test__rdpmc(void)
>> >  
>> >  	fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
>> >  	if (fd < 0) {
>> > -		die("Error: sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned "
>> > -		    "with %d (%s)\n", fd, strerror(errno));
>> > +		pr_debug("Error: sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned "
>> > +			 "with %d (%s)\n", fd, strerror(errno));
>> 
>> s/pr_debug/pr_err/ ?
>> 
>> Otherwise the message will not be shown unless -v option is given
>> - and it's not sync with the changelog ;-)
>
> Oops :-\ Can you sent a fixup patch for this and the other case?

Will send it right soon.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/