Re: [PATCH 0/5] dev_<level> and dynamic_debug cleanups

From: Jason Baron
Date: Mon Sep 10 2012 - 16:56:06 EST

On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 06:55:50PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 11:35 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > If nobody else thinks this patch is better, let's at least add a comment in
> > __dev_printk() and __netdev_printk() to fix dynamic debug, if these are changed.
> Or maybe make dynamic_emit_prefix a public function
> and move the __dynamic_<foo>_printk functions to
> nearby the __<foo>_printk functions so it's easier to
> see that changing one requires the other to change.

ok, that makes sense to me.



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at