Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: revise deassert sequence
From: Omar Ramirez Luna
Date: Mon Sep 10 2012 - 13:14:04 EST
On 6 September 2012 10:12, Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@xxxxxx> wrote:
> The sequence is good, I'm just a little bit concern about the
> duplication of code compared to _enable sequence.
> That being said, this is the consequence of removing the hardreset
> sequence outside of the main _enable/_shutdown sequence.
> So I'm not sure I have any better way of doing that :-(
Indeed, it should be exactly the same as putting back the reset
sequence into _enable/_shutdown, so with these patches I was expecting
we could gather the hard reset users and see if they needed anything
else beyond these functions, if not, perhaps just put back the reset
code into _enable/_shutdown paths.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/