Re: [PATCH v6] pstore/ram: Add ramoops support for the FlattenedDevice Tree.

[Marco Stornelli]

Il 08/09/2012 07:29, Anton Vorontsov ha scritto:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 11:29:36AM -0700, Bryan Freed wrote:
> > When called with a non-zero of_node, fill out a new ramoops_platform_data
> > with data from the specified Flattened Device Tree node.
> > Update ramoops documentation with the new FDT interface.
> > Update devicetree/binding documentation with pstore/ramoops.txt.
>
> Thanks for your work, Bryan! There were a few issues, I fixed
> them myself but I need your confirmation if you're OK w/ all
> the changes.
>
> First of, the Signed-off-by tag is missing, but I see it in v5.
> I also see that v5 had an Ack from Kees Cook, you did not preserve it,
> but generally it's a good idea to do so (if vX -> v(X+1) changes
> aren't drastic).
>
> [...]
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- record-size: Specifies the size of each record in preserved memory.
> > +- console-size: Specifies the size of the console log.
> > +- ftrace-size: Specifies the size of the ftrace log.
> > +- ecc-size: Specifies the size of each record's ECC buffer.
> > +- dump-oops: Specifies to dump oops in addition to panics.
>
> Personally, I don't see how this fits into device tree. It doesn't
> describe hardware, instead it's more a configuration stuff, which
> usually we try to not put into the device tree.
>
> It would be better to have a sane defaults in ramoops, instead of
> introducing more "virtual" stuff in the device tree. That is, feel
> free to change defaults if they seem to be not enough for most your
> setups.
>
> The only property that I see which is truly hardware-specific is
> ecc-size. E.g. if we're pretty sure that a specific hw does not
> need ecc, it's OK to avoid it. And some hw setups might require
> bigger ECC sizes, so it's OK to have it in the device-tree.
>
> > static struct ramoops_platform_data * __init
> > of_ramoops_platform_data(struct device *dev)
>
> You call this function from __devinit section, so using __init
> is an error.
>
> WARNING: fs/pstore/ramoops.o(.devinit.text+0x37): Section mismatch in reference from the function ramoops_probe() to the function .init.text:of_ramoops_platform_data()
> The function __devinit ramoops_probe() references
>
> I changed this to __devnit.
>
> [...]
> > +	pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (pdata == NULL)
>
> I wonder why people prefer to not write !pdata, which is more
> natural when reading the code.. :-)

I think it's the same for sizeof, it's much more readable
sizeof(struct ramoops_platform_data).

Marco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/