Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] rcu: Avoid spurious RCU CPU stallwarnings

[Steven Rostedt]

On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 14:58 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> > All these cases deserve a warning.
> 
> Agreed, and that is the whole purpose of the stall warnings.

Then let me ask the question again. According to the change log:

> If a given CPU avoids the idle loop but also avoids starting a new
> RCU grace period for a full minute, RCU can issue spurious RCU CPU
> stall warnings.  This commit fixes this issue by adding a check for
> ongoing grace period to avoid these spurious stall warnings.


I'm still confused by what is "this issue"? And why is it being fixed.
It sounds to me that the "issue" was a CPU avoiding starting a new RCU
grace period for a full minute. Which to me sounds like a bug in which
we *want* a warning. Why is this patch needed?

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/