[PATCH] audit: use list_move instead of list_del/list_add in audit-tree

From: Wei Yongjun
Date: Thu Sep 06 2012 - 01:25:35 EST


From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Using list_move() instead of list_del() + list_add().

spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem.
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/audit_tree.c | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
index ed206fd..56c4a9e 100644
--- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
+++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
@@ -585,8 +585,7 @@ void audit_trim_trees(void)

tree = container_of(cursor.next, struct audit_tree, list);
get_tree(tree);
- list_del(&cursor);
- list_add(&cursor, &tree->list);
+ list_move(&cursor, &tree->list);
mutex_unlock(&audit_filter_mutex);

err = kern_path(tree->pathname, 0, &path);
@@ -738,8 +737,7 @@ int audit_tag_tree(char *old, char *new)

tree = container_of(cursor.next, struct audit_tree, list);
get_tree(tree);
- list_del(&cursor);
- list_add(&cursor, &tree->list);
+ list_move(&cursor, &tree->list);
mutex_unlock(&audit_filter_mutex);

err = kern_path(tree->pathname, 0, &path2);
@@ -764,8 +762,7 @@ int audit_tag_tree(char *old, char *new)
mutex_lock(&audit_filter_mutex);
spin_lock(&hash_lock);
if (!tree->goner) {
- list_del(&tree->list);
- list_add(&tree->list, &tree_list);
+ list_move(&tree->list, &tree_list);
}
spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
put_tree(tree);
@@ -776,8 +773,7 @@ int audit_tag_tree(char *old, char *new)

tree = container_of(barrier.prev, struct audit_tree, list);
get_tree(tree);
- list_del(&tree->list);
- list_add(&tree->list, &barrier);
+ list_move(&tree->list, &barrier);
mutex_unlock(&audit_filter_mutex);

if (!failed) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/