Re: [PATCH 1/1] tcp: Wrong timeout for SYN segments

[Eric Dumazet]

On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 12:00 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 11:29 +0200, Alex Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > Actual 6 SYN frames are sent. The initial one and 5 retries.
> > 
> 
> first one had a t0 + 0 delay. How can it count ???
> 
> > The kernel is waiting another 32 seconds for a SYN+ACK and then gives 
> > the ETIMEDOUT back to userspace.
> > 
> > Do you mean that we have to send another SYN packet after the 3 minutes?
> > 
> 
> First SYN is not a retransmit
> 
> R2 = time_of_last_SYN - time_of_initial_SYN (t0) = 31
> 
> If you read RFC it states :
> 
> "In particular, R2 for a SYN segment MUST
>  be set large enough to provide retransmission of the segment
>  for at least 3 minutes."
> 
> 
> That means that the last _retransmit_ MUST happen after 180 seconds.
> 
> And not :
> 
> Send all the restransmits at t0 + 1, then wait 180 seconds before giving
> connect() a timeout indication.
> 
> 

Therefore, the minimal connect() timeout should be : 180 + 100 seconds

(allowing 100 seconds for the SYNACKs sent in answer of the very last
retransmit to come back)

(100 seconds is the R2 for non SYN frames)

RFC quote : The value of R2 SHOULD
            correspond to at least 100 seconds. 



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/