Re: apparent regressions from TLB range flushing page set

[Jan Beulich]

>>> Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx> 08/22/12 5:24 AM >>>
>On 08/20/2012 10:12 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>I was thought you have 'Agreed' for xen part code. :)

I had agreed to it being done the right way, and I had pointed out the
problem once. I can't say for sure that I looked at the most recent rev
closely enough to spot the issue still being unfixed.

>> For one, while TLB_FLUSH_ALL gets passed as 'end' argument to
>> flush_tlb_others(), the Xen code was made to check its 'start'
>> parameter.
>
>Do you mean need the following change? --untested.

Yes. I'd question though whether for that special case it shouldn't be
start _and_ end to get passed the special value.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/