Re: [PATCH 0/4] fat: fix ESTALE errors

[OGAWA Hirofumi]

Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> (I assume this issue == orphaned inode issue).
>>
>> ext* doesn't have this issue. If ext* made orphaned inode, ext* doesn't
>> delete inode from inode table until calling iput() from last referencer.
>>
>> In FAT case, FAT inode is embedded into dir entry. So, if unlinked inode
>> (then orphaned inode is detached (fat_detach())), FAT deletes inode (dir
>> entry) from dir.
>
> Could be possible to not delete it?

It should be deletable on linux. Because many apps are assuming
orphaned inode works.

> I mean using a special value for this case, mark delete (using 0xe5 as
> first character) but put for instance creation month to be egal to 15.
>
> This entry will be therefore be keep and not overwritten by successive
> file creation.
>
> At least this solve the file deleted issue (not the rename issue unfortunatly)

I assume you are saying to prevent creation somehow, not deletion. Yes, it
is possible though, it would give additional overhead and complexity to us.

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/