Re: [PATCH v8 1/5] mm: introduce a common interface for balloonpages mobility

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Tue Aug 21 2012 - 14:30:29 EST


On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 05:20:11PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 09:47 -0300, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> > + mapping = rcu_access_pointer(page->mapping);
> > + if (mapping)
> > + mapping = mapping->assoc_mapping;
>
> The comment near rcu_access_pointer() explicitly says:
>
> * Return the value of the specified RCU-protected pointer, but omit the
> * smp_read_barrier_depends() and keep the ACCESS_ONCE(). This is useful
> * when the value of this pointer is accessed, but the pointer is not
> * dereferenced,
>
> Yet you dereference the pointer... smells like fail to me.

Indeed!

This will break DEC Alpha. In addition, if ->mapping can transition
from non-NULL to NULL, and if you used rcu_access_pointer() rather
than rcu_dereference() to avoid lockdep-RCU from yelling at you about
not either being in an RCU read-side critical section or holding an
update-side lock, you can see failures as follows:

1. CPU 0 runs the above code, picks up mapping, and finds it non-NULL.

2. CPU 0 is preempted or otherwise delayed. (Keep in mind that
even disabling interrupts in a guest OS does not prevent the
host hypervisor from preempting!)

3. Some other CPU NULLs page->mapping. Because CPU 0 isn't doing
anything to prevent it, this other CPU frees the memory.

4. CPU 0 resumes, and then accesses what is now the freelist.
Arbitrarily bad things start happening.

If you are in a read-side critical section, use rcu_dereference() instead
of rcu_access_pointer(). If you are holding an update-side lock, use
rcu_dereference_protected() and say what lock you are holding. If you
are doing something else, please say what it is.

Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/