Re: [PATCH] perf/x86: fix SNB-EP CBO and PCU uncore PMU filter management

[Stephane Eranian]

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 18:22 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>         .constraints            = snbep_uncore_cbox_constraints,
>>         .ops                    = &snbep_uncore_msr_ops,
>>         .format_group           = &snbep_uncore_cbox_format_group,
>> +       .extra_regs             = snbep_uncore_cbo_extra_regs,
>
> The whole cbo vs cbox thing is a bit unfortunate, I know Intel tends to
> forget to type the last letter, but could we be consistent?
>
> Ideally Intel would have called the thing a Cache Coherence Unit or
> somesuch to match the Power Control Unit, But seeing its called C-Box, I
> don't see the point of saving the 1 character and obfuscate the name.
> I've even seen CBO Box used, which is of course completely ridiculous.

Ok, I can resubmit with the word cbox instead.

Still missing is the HA box opcode match/mask support.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/