Re: [PATCH 3/3] netfilter: replace list_for_each_continue_rcu withnew interface

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Mon Aug 20 2012 - 20:04:27 EST


On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:33:39PM +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> From: Michael Wang <wangyun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch replaces list_for_each_continue_rcu() with
> list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() to allow removing
> list_for_each_continue_rcu().
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> net/netfilter/core.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c
> index e19f365..50225bd 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/core.c
> @@ -131,14 +131,14 @@ unsigned int nf_iterate(struct list_head *head,
> int hook_thresh)
> {
> unsigned int verdict;
> + struct nf_hook_ops *elem = list_entry_rcu(*i,
> + struct nf_hook_ops, list);
>
> /*
> * The caller must not block between calls to this
> * function because of risk of continuing from deleted element.
> */
> - list_for_each_continue_rcu(*i, head) {
> - struct nf_hook_ops *elem = (struct nf_hook_ops *)*i;
> -
> + list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(elem, head, list) {
> if (hook_thresh > elem->priority)
> continue;
>
> @@ -155,11 +155,14 @@ repeat:
> continue;
> }
> #endif
> - if (verdict != NF_REPEAT)
> + if (verdict != NF_REPEAT) {
> + *i = &elem->list;
> return verdict;
> + }
> goto repeat;
> }
> }
> + *i = &elem->list;
> return NF_ACCEPT;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/