Re: [PATCH 4/8] time: Condense timekeeper.xtime into xtime_sec

From: John Stultz
Date: Mon Aug 20 2012 - 14:59:26 EST


On 08/19/2012 02:02 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

The timekeeper struct has a xtime_nsec, which keeps the
sub-nanosecond remainder. This ends up being somewhat
duplicative of the timekeeper.xtime.tv_nsec value, and we
have to do extra work to keep them apart, copying the full
nsec portion out and back in over and over.

This patch simplifies some of the logic by taking the timekeeper
xtime value and splitting it into timekeeper.xtime_sec and
reuses the timekeeper.xtime_nsec for the sub-second portion
(stored in higher res shifted nanoseconds).

This simplifies some of the accumulation logic. And will
allow for more accurate timekeeping once the vsyscall code
is updated to use the shifted nanosecond remainder.
This (together with b44d50d "time: Fix casting issue in tk_set_xtime and
tk_xtime_add") is causing resume to hang on the iBook (PowerBook6,7).
The fact that the add-on commit is needed to uncover the bug might give
a hint, but I'm unable to decipher it.

Thanks for the bug report and narrowing this down.

I'm not very familiar w/ the iBook hardware, but does it use a clocksource, or does it use arch_gettimeoffset()?

I suspect that the casting has avoided clipping some strange values from the persistent clock.

Could you try with the following patch against Linus' HEAD? I suspect it will let the box resume (although it will seem as though no time was spent in resume) and then let me know what the JDB lines print out?

thanks
-john

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index e16af19..03f5a82 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -753,10 +753,14 @@ static void timekeeping_resume(void)
clocksource_resume();
write_seqlock_irqsave(&tk->lock, flags);
+ printk("JDB: suspend_time: %ld:%ld resume_time: %ld:%ld\n",
+ timekeeping_suspend_time.tv_sec, timekeeping_suspend_time.tv_nsec,
+ ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec);
if (timespec_compare(&ts, &timekeeping_suspend_time) > 0) {
ts = timespec_sub(ts, timekeeping_suspend_time);
- __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, &ts);
+ printk("JDB: Trying to add: %ld:%ld\n", ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec);
+ //__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, &ts);
}
/* re-base the last cycle value */
tk->clock->cycle_last = tk->clock->read(tk->clock);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/