Re: [PATCH] hardening: add PROT_FINAL prot flag to mmap/mprotect

[Kees Cook]

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:11:11PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> This patch adds support for the PROT_FINAL flag to
> the mmap() and mprotect() syscalls.
> 
> The PROT_FINAL flag indicates that the requested set
> of protection bits should be final, i.e., it shall
> not be allowed for a subsequent mprotect call to
> set protection bits that were not set already.
> 
> This is mainly intended for the dynamic linker,
> which sets up the address space on behalf of
> dynamic binaries. By using this flag, it can
> prevent exploited code from remapping read-only
> executable code or data sections read-write.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

This seems like a good idea to me. It would allow more than just the
loader to harden userspace allocations. It's a more direct version of
PaX's "MPROTECT" feature[1]. That feature hardens existing loaders,
but doesn't play nice with JITs (like Java), but this lets a loader
(or JIT) opt-in to the protection and have some direct control over it.

It seems like there needs to be a sensible way to detect that this flag is
available, though.

-Kees

[1] http://pax.grsecurity.net/docs/mprotect.txt

-- 
Kees Cook                                            @outflux.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/