Re: [PATCH] netfilter: PTR_RET can be used

[Pablo Neira Ayuso]

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 08:14:49PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > --- linux.orig/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtable_filter.c	2012-07-29 08:41:09.703759534 +0800
> > > +++ linux/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtable_filter.c	2012-07-29 08:41:14.255759643 +0800
> > > @@ -100,9 +100,7 @@ static struct nf_hook_ops ebt_ops_filter
> > >  static int __net_init frame_filter_net_init(struct net *net)
> > >  {
> > >  	net->xt.frame_filter = ebt_register_table(net, &frame_filter);
> > > -	if (IS_ERR(net->xt.frame_filter))
> > > -		return PTR_ERR(net->xt.frame_filter);
> > > -	return 0;
> > > +	return PTR_RET(net->xt.frame_filter);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > 
> > i do not understand this,
> > ebt_register_table() return (struct ebt_table *) on success
> > 
> > Does PTR_RET really return 0 if this is a propper pointer ?
> 
> Right. Here is how PTR_RET defined. This patch does not change any behavior.
> 
> static inline int __must_check PTR_RET(const void *ptr)
> {      
>         if (IS_ERR(ptr))
>                 return PTR_ERR(ptr);
>         else   
>                 return 0;
> }

Applied, thanks Fengguang.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/