Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] xattr: extract simple_xattr code from tmpfs

From: Hugh Dickins
Date: Mon Aug 20 2012 - 03:10:51 EST


On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:44:54PM -0400, aris@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Li Zefan <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Extract in-memory xattr APIs from tmpfs. Will be used by cgroup.
> >
> > $ size vmlinux.o
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 4658782 880729 5195032 10734543 a3cbcf vmlinux.o
> > $ size vmlinux.o
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 4658957 880729 5195032 10734718 a3cc7e vmlinux.o
> >
> > v6:
> > - no changes
> > v5:
> > - no changes
> > v4:
> > - move simple_xattrs_free() to fs/xattr.c
> > v3:
> > - in kmem_xattrs_free(), reinitialize the list
> > - use simple_xattr_* prefix
> > - introduce simple_xattr_add() to prevent direct list usage
> >
> > Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hugh, can you please review and ack this one?

Yes, it looks nice to me. I might have preferred more as inlines in
the header file to lower the slight init/evict overhead, and I don't
see why __simple_xattr_set() isn't using simple_xattr_alloc() in the
same way that shmem_xattr_set() used shmem_xattr_alloc(). But none
of that matters:

Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/