Re: IPv4 BUG: held lock freed!

[Eric Dumazet]

On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 23:05 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 22:15 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> >
> >> Will it still has problem if code goes here without sock_hold(sk)?
> >
> > Not sure of what you mean.
> 
> See my comments in the function.
> Is that a potential problem?
> 

No problem.

It always been like that. Thats the whole point having a refcount at the
first place.

The last sock_put(sk) should free the socket.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/