Re: IPv4 BUG: held lock freed!

[Eric Dumazet]

On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 22:15 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:

> Will it still has problem if code goes here without sock_hold(sk)?

Not sure of what you mean.

At the time tcp_write_timer() runs, we own one reference on the socket.
(this reference was taken in sk_reset_timer())

On old kernels, if we found the socket locked by the user, we used to
rearm the timer for a 50ms delay (and thus did sock_hold() again)

Another way to avoid the bug would to make sure sk_reset_timer()
increases refcount _before_ setting the timer, but its adding one atomic
in fast path...

diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 8f67ced..d1745b7 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -2114,8 +2114,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_send_sigurg);
 void sk_reset_timer(struct sock *sk, struct timer_list* timer,
 		    unsigned long expires)
 {
-	if (!mod_timer(timer, expires))
-		sock_hold(sk);
+	sock_hold(sk);
+	if (mod_timer(timer, expires))
+		__sock_put(sk);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_reset_timer);
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/