Re: lockdep warning on rt_mutex_lock()

From: Fengguang Wu
Date: Sat Aug 18 2012 - 00:59:17 EST


On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 07:44:37AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:02:40PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 06:43:28AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 06:06:35PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >
> > > > FYI, a lockdep warning:
> > >
> > > Certainly looks problematic!
> > >
> > > Any hint as to what version of the kernel produced this splat?
> > > (Yes, lazy of me to ask, I know, but I am not seeing it in my testing.)
> >
> > It happens on both 3.5.0 and 3.6-rc1. Will bisect (try older kernels) help?
> > Bisect is handy for me :)
>
> Bisection would be very welcome!!! ;-)

The bisect result is...

commit 9e571a82f0cb205a65a0ea41657f19f22b7fabb8
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Sep 30 21:26:52 2010 -0700

rcu: add tracing for TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU

Add tracing for the tiny RCU implementations, including statistics on
boosting in the case of TINY_PREEMPT_RCU and RCU_BOOST.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/