Re: [v2.6.34-stable 013/165] xfs: Fix possible memory corruption inxfs_readlink

From: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
Date: Fri Aug 17 2012 - 11:39:00 EST


On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 03:45:57PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> -------------------
> This is a commit scheduled for the next v2.6.34 longterm release.
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/paulg/longterm-queue-2.6.34.git
> If you see a problem with using this for longterm, please comment.
> -------------------
>
> commit b52a360b2aa1c59ba9970fb0f52bbb093fcc7a24 upstream.
>
> Fixes a possible memory corruption when the link is larger than
> MAXPATHLEN and XFS_DEBUG is not enabled. This also remove the
> S_ISLNK assert, since the inode mode is checked previously in
> xfs_readlink_by_handle() and via VFS.
>
> Updated to address concerns raised by Ben Hutchings about the loose
> attention paid to 32- vs 64-bit values, and the lack of handling a
> potentially negative pathlen value:
> - Changed type of "pathlen" to be xfs_fsize_t, to match that of
> ip->i_d.di_size
> - Added checking for a negative pathlen to the too-long pathlen
> test, and generalized the message that gets reported in that case
> to reflect the change
> As a result, if a negative pathlen were encountered, this function
> would return EFSCORRUPTED (and would fail an assertion for a debug
> build)--just as would a too-long pathlen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> [PG: no xfs_alert in 2.6.34; use xfs_fs_cmn_err(CE_ALERT, ...) instead]
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]

commit 9b025eb3a89e041bab6698e3858706be2385d692 ("xfs: Fix missing
xfs_iunlock() on error recovery path in xfs_readlink()") addresses a
regression with this change, something to consider for inclusion too.

--
[]'s
Herton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/