Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: lpc32xx_udc: Port to new start/stop interface

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Fri Aug 17 2012 - 07:39:18 EST


On 08/17/2012 01:32 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
How about the following: Below, I show how the initialization of the
current controller is done (statically). Removing this struct
initialization completely would make the code much uglier, introducing
many individual assignments.

I said what I had to say, I leave it up to Felipe.

static struct lpc32xx_udc controller = {
.gadget = {
.ops =&lpc32xx_udc_ops,
.ep0 =&controller.ep[0].ep,
.name = driver_name,
.dev = {
.init_name = "gadget",
.release = nop_release,
}
},
.ep[0] = {
.ep = {
.name = "ep0",
.ops =&lpc32xx_ep_ops,
},
.udc =&controller,
.maxpacket = 64,
.hwep_num_base = 0,
.hwep_num = 0, /* Can be 0 or 1, has special
handling */

Can it be 0 or 1 or has it to be 0? Who would change and why?

.lep = 0,
.eptype = EP_CTL_TYPE,
},
.ep[1] = {
.ep = {
.name = "ep1-int",
.ops =&lpc32xx_ep_ops,
},
.udc =&controller,
.maxpacket = 64,
.hwep_num_base = 2,
.hwep_num = 0, /* 2 or 3, will be set later */

Why not now?

.lep = 1,
.eptype = EP_INT_TYPE,

Do you have any restrictions on these endpoints? I mean can you pick
any endpoints for BULK/INT/ISO or have they been pre-defined by HW?

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/