Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] PM / Sleep: introduce dpm_for_each_dev

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 09:54:56AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
> > index 44d1f23..bf86f89 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pm.h
> > @@ -640,6 +640,7 @@ extern void __suspend_report_result(const char *function, void *fn, int ret);
> >         } while (0)
> >
> >  extern int device_pm_wait_for_dev(struct device *sub, struct device *dev);
> > +extern void dpm_for_each_dev(void *data, void (*fn)(struct device *, void *));
> >
> >  extern int pm_generic_prepare(struct device *dev);
> >  extern int pm_generic_suspend_late(struct device *dev);
> > @@ -679,6 +680,10 @@ static inline int device_pm_wait_for_dev(struct device *a, struct device *b)
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +void dpm_for_each_dev(void *data, void (*fn)(struct device *, void *))
> 
> Sorry, the above line is wrong, and should be defined as 'static inline'.
> Please drop this one and take the attachment patch.

Can you please just resend these, as this attachment was in base64 :(

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/