Re: [PATCH 12/13] ovl: switch to __inode_permission()

[Casey Schaufler]

On 8/15/2012 8:48 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When checking permissions on an overlayfs inode we do not take into
> account either device cgroup restrictions nor security permissions.
> This allows a user to mount an overlayfs layer over a restricted device
> directory and by pass those permissions to open otherwise restricted
> files.

Why is this a good idea? Either you're not including enough context
about the conditions under which this can occur, or you're suggesting
the introduction of a trivial mechanism for bypassing all file access
controls. This does not seem right.


>
> Switch over to __inode_permissions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/overlayfs/inode.c |   12 +-----------
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/inode.c b/fs/overlayfs/inode.c
> index e854720..f3a534f 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/inode.c
> @@ -100,19 +100,9 @@ int ovl_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
>  		if (is_upper && !IS_RDONLY(inode) && IS_RDONLY(realinode) &&
>  		    (S_ISREG(mode) || S_ISDIR(mode) || S_ISLNK(mode)))
>  			goto out_dput;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * Nobody gets write access to an immutable file.
> -		 */
> -		err = -EACCES;
> -		if (IS_IMMUTABLE(realinode))
> -			goto out_dput;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (realinode->i_op->permission)
> -		err = realinode->i_op->permission(realinode, mask);
> -	else
> -		err = generic_permission(realinode, mask);
> +	err = __inode_permission(realinode, mask);
>  out_dput:
>  	dput(alias);
>  	return err;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/