Re: [PATCH] perf: Let O= makes handle relative paths

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 15:18 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:06:34AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > That was the case in the past, but IIRC PeterZ advocated not to and I
> > agreed.
> 
> Maybe you guys need to explain yourselves :) I mean, the dir is not
> present so we're not overwriting anything. And since we say "O=..." on
> the command line, it is actually expected that we really mean it... why
> type it, otherwise?

Because you're an idiot and made a typo ;-) Happens to me all the time.

The regular kernel build doesn't create non-existent O= targets either
iirc. 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/