Re: yama_ptrace_access_check(): possible recursive locking detected

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 15:01 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> BTW, set_task_comm()->wmb() and memset() should die. There are
> not needed afaics, and the comment is misleading. 

As long as we guarantee there's always a terminating '\0', now strlcpy()
doesn't pad the result, however if we initialize the ->comm to all 0s in
fork() or thereabouts, we should get this guarantee from the strlcpy()
since that will never replace the last byte with anything but 0.

That barrier is indeed completely pointless as there's no pairing
barrier anywhere.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/