Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] virtio_balloon: introduce migration primitives toballoon pages

[Mel Gorman]

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:25:28PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:05:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:11:13PM -0300, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:51:39PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > What I think you should do is use rcu for access.
> > > > And here sync rcu before freeing.
> > > > Maybe an overkill but at least a documented synchronization
> > > > primitive, and it is very light weight.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I liked your suggestion on barriers, as well.
> > > 
> > 
> > I have not thought about this as deeply as I shouold but is simply rechecking
> > the mapping under the pages_lock to make sure the page is still a balloon
> > page an option? i.e. use pages_lock to stabilise page->mapping.
> 
> To clarify, are you concerned about cost of rcu_read_lock
> for non balloon pages?
> 

Not as such, but given the choice between introducing RCU locking and
rechecking page->mapping under a spinlock I would choose the latter as it
is more straight-forward.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/