Re: [PATCH 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Tue Aug 14 2012 - 20:28:34 EST
Hello,
(Sasha, would it be possible to change your MUA so that it breaks long
lines. It's pretty difficult to reply to.)
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 02:24:49AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> The hashtable uses hlist. hlist provides us with an entire family of
> init functions which I'm supposed to use to initialize hlist heads.
>
> So while a memset(0) will work perfectly here, I consider that
> cheating - it results in an uglier code that assumes to know about
> hlist internals, and will probably break as soon as someone tries to
> do something to hlist.
I think we should stick with INIT_HLIST_HEAD(). It's not a hot path
and we might add, say, debug fields or initialization magics added
later. If this really matters, the right thing to do would be adding
something like INIT_HLIST_HEAD_ARRAY().
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/