Re: [patch 3/8] procfs: Add ability to plug in auxiliary fdinfoproviders

[Al Viro]

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 02:21:47AM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > Hmm, in very first versions I've been using one ->show method, but
> > then I thought that this is not very correlate with seq-files idea
> > where for each record show/next sequence is called. I'll update (this
> > for sure will make code simplier, and I'll have to check for seq-file
> > overflow after seq_printf call to not continue printing data for too
> > long if buffer already out of space).
> 
> Al, I'll cook the whole series tomorrow and resend it for review,
> also I guess the new show_fdinfo() member in file-operations should
> be guarded with CONFIG_PROC_FS, right?

I seriously doubt that it's worth bothering.  If somebody cares, they
can add making it conditional later.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/