Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] virtio_balloon: introduce migration primitivesto balloon pages

[Rik van Riel]

On 08/14/2012 04:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

> To clarify, the global state that this patch adds, is ugly
> even if we didn't support multiple balloons yet.
> So I don't think I can accept such a patch.
> Rusty has a final word here, maybe he thinks differently.

Before deciding that "does not support multiple balloon drivers
at once" is an issue, is there any use case at all for having
multiple balloon drivers active at a time?

I do not see any.

--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/