Re: [PATCHSET] timer: clean up initializers and implement irqsafetimers

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:10:24AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Timer internals are protected by irqsafe lock but the lock is
> > naturally dropped and irq enabled while a timer is executed.  This
> > makes dequeueing timer for execution and the actual execution
> > non-atomic against IRQs.  No matter what the timer function does, IRQs
> > can occur between timer dispatch and execution.  This means that an
> > IRQ handler could interrupt any timer in progress and it's impossible
> > for an IRQ handler to cancel and drain a timer.
> 
> If nobody objects, I'll route this through wq/for-3.7 together with
> "workqueue: use irqsafe timer in delayed_work" patchset.  If you
> object, please scream.

Second thoughts.

Why the hell are you trying to rush stuff which affects a well
maintained part of the kernel through your own tree w/o having the
courtesy of contacting the maintainer politely instead of sending an
ultimatum?

You posted that series less than a week ago and there is no reason why
you need to push hard on inclusion into next after a few days.

If you really cared about my opinion you could have figured out that
I'm on vacation.

Yours grumpy

      tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/