Re: DT GPIO numbering?
From: Linus Walleij
Date: Tue Aug 14 2012 - 06:00:16 EST
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Johannes Stezenbach <js@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Actually I think the kernel internal GPIO numbers shouldn't be in the
> sysfs API, instead userspace should use the names.
This is true, but we cannot remove these numbers because they
are now in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-gpio
And while the "testing" ABI is, well for testing, it would probably
break a lot of stuff it we removed it.
But we can sure add names. However these would still sit under
/sys/class/gpio/gpioN/name
Or do you suggest we simply duplicate all GPIOs which have
names under /sys/class/gpio/named/<name>
or something like that?
I know Grant may have opinions on this...
> Probably it's
> best to not use /sys/class/gpio/export but instead let the board
> init code export the GPIOs available to userspace with proper names.
This sounds true.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/