Re: [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: use system_highpri_wq for unbind_work

From: JoonSoo Kim
Date: Mon Aug 13 2012 - 13:52:36 EST


2012/8/14 Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:02:31AM +0900, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
>> 2012/8/14 Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:17:52AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> > Is this from an actual workload? ie. do you have a test case where
>> > this matters?
>>
>> No. it is not from an actual workload.
>> I got this idea suddenly, during implementing others.
>> I will do a test for this tomorrow.
>
> I don't think it's a bad idea and guess this wouldn't make much
> difference under most workload. Was mostly wondering whether this
> came from some crazy phone powersave optimization.

Okay.
It is not from an actual workload,
but I intent to optimize some crazy phone powersave :)

Thanks for comments.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/