[PATCH v8 6/6] kvm: Add de-assert option to KVM_IRQ_ACKFD

From: Alex Williamson
Date: Fri Aug 10 2012 - 18:37:55 EST


It's likely (vfio) that one of the reasons to watch for an IRQ ACK
is to de-assert and re-enable an interrupt. As the IRQ ACK notfier
is already watching a GSI for an IRQ source ID we can easily couple
these together.

Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 4 ++++
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 1 +
include/linux/kvm.h | 3 +++
virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
index 77b4837..128d4c3 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
@@ -2029,6 +2029,10 @@ the eventfd is only triggered when the specified IRQ source ID is
pending. On deassign, fd, gsi, and irq_source_id (if provided on assign)
must be provided.

+When KVM_CAP_IRQ_ACKFD_DEASSERT is available the flag
+KVM_IRQ_ACKFD_FLAG_IRQ_DEASSERT may be used on assignment to specify
+that the GSI should be de-asserted prior to eventfd notification.
+This flag requires an IRQ source ID to be provided as described above.

5. The kvm_run structure
------------------------
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 3d98e59..691b00d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -2178,6 +2178,7 @@ int kvm_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext)
case KVM_CAP_IRQFD_ASSERT_ONLY:
case KVM_CAP_IRQ_ACKFD:
case KVM_CAP_IRQ_ACKFD_IRQ_SOURCE_ID:
+ case KVM_CAP_IRQ_ACKFD_DEASSERT:
r = 1;
break;
case KVM_CAP_COALESCED_MMIO:
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm.h b/include/linux/kvm.h
index 0f53bd5..331631e 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm.h
@@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info {
#define KVM_CAP_IRQFD_ASSERT_ONLY 83
#define KVM_CAP_IRQ_ACKFD 84
#define KVM_CAP_IRQ_ACKFD_IRQ_SOURCE_ID 85
+#define KVM_CAP_IRQ_ACKFD_DEASSERT 86

#ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING

@@ -712,6 +713,8 @@ struct kvm_irq_source_id {
#define KVM_IRQ_ACKFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN (1 << 0)
/* Available with KVM_CAP_IRQ_ACKFD_IRQ_SOURCE_ID */
#define KVM_IRQ_ACKFD_FLAG_IRQ_SOURCE_ID (1 << 1)
+/* Available with KVM_CAP_IRQ_ACKFD_DEASSERT */
+#define KVM_IRQ_ACKFD_FLAG_DEASSERT (1 << 2)

struct kvm_irq_ackfd {
__u32 flags;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
index ff5c784..ffc6a13 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
@@ -682,6 +682,7 @@ kvm_ioeventfd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_ioeventfd *args)

struct _irq_ackfd {
struct kvm *kvm;
+ bool deassert; /* de-assert on ack? */
struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd; /* signaled on ack */
struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier notifier;
/* Setup/shutdown */
@@ -805,6 +806,10 @@ static void irq_ackfd_acked(struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *notifier)

ackfd = container_of(notifier, struct _irq_ackfd, notifier);

+ if (ackfd->deassert)
+ kvm_set_irq(ackfd->kvm, ackfd->notifier.irq_source_id,
+ ackfd->notifier.gsi, 0);
+
eventfd_signal(ackfd->eventfd, 1);
}

@@ -845,6 +850,12 @@ static int kvm_assign_irq_ackfd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_ackfd *args)
ackfd->notifier.irq_source_id = -1;
ackfd->notifier.irq_acked = irq_ackfd_acked;

+ ackfd->deassert = args->flags & KVM_IRQ_ACKFD_FLAG_DEASSERT;
+ if (ackfd->deassert && ackfd->notifier.irq_source_id < 0) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto fail;
+ }
+
/*
* Install our own custom wake-up handling so we are notified via
* a callback whenever someone releases the underlying eventfd
@@ -945,7 +956,8 @@ fail:
int kvm_irq_ackfd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_ackfd *args)
{
if (args->flags & ~(KVM_IRQ_ACKFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN |
- KVM_IRQ_ACKFD_FLAG_IRQ_SOURCE_ID))
+ KVM_IRQ_ACKFD_FLAG_IRQ_SOURCE_ID |
+ KVM_IRQ_ACKFD_FLAG_DEASSERT))
return -EINVAL;

if (args->flags & KVM_IRQ_ACKFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/