Re: [PATCH] sched: remove useless code in yield_to

[Michael Wang]

On 08/10/2012 11:05 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
> On 07/03/2012 02:34 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
>> From: Michael Wang <wangyun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> it's impossible to enter else branch if we have set skip_clock_update
>> in task_yield_fair(), as yield_to_task_fair() will directly return
>> true after invoke task_yield_fair().
> 
> Could I get some conclusion on this patch? Should we clean up that peace
> of code or leave it there?
s /peace/piece and cc mike...
> 
> Regards,
> Michael Wang
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  kernel/sched/core.c |    7 -------
>>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index 9bb7d28..77c14aa 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -4737,13 +4737,6 @@ again:
>>  		 */
>>  		if (preempt && rq != p_rq)
>>  			resched_task(p_rq->curr);
>> -	} else {
>> -		/*
>> -		 * We might have set it in task_yield_fair(), but are
>> -		 * not going to schedule(), so don't want to skip
>> -		 * the next update.
>> -		 */
>> -		rq->skip_clock_update = 0;
>>  	}
>>
>>  out:
>>
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/