Re: NULL pointer dereference in selinux_ip_postroute_compat

[Eric Dumazet]

On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 15:50 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:

> Yep.  I was just trying to see if there was a way we could avoid having to 
> make it conditional on CONFIG_SECURITY, but I think this is a better approach 
> than the alternatives.
> 
> I'm also looking into making sure we get a sane LSM label on the per-cpu sock 
> as security_sk_alloc() just allocates and initializes the LSM blob to a basic 
> starting value (unlabeled_t in the case of SELinux) ... that is likely to be 
> the tricky bit.

It seems previous code did the same thing in sk_prot_alloc() ?


> 
> Regardless, I'm okay with us merging the patch below now to fix the panic and 
> I'll supply a follow-up patch to fix the labeling once I figure out a solution 
> that seems reasonable.  Does that work for you?  David?
> 
> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

John, could you confirm this fixes the problem ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/