Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: add reference counting for exporter module

From: Daniel Vetter
Date: Wed Aug 08 2012 - 10:06:18 EST


On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:53:10PM +0200, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> On 08/08/2012 03:35 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Tomasz,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch.
> >
> > On Wednesday 08 August 2012 12:17:41 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
> >> This patch adds reference counting on a module that exports dma-buf and
> >> implements its operations. This prevents the module from being unloaded
> >> while DMABUF file is in use.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Stanislawski <t.stanislaws@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/dma-buf-sharing.txt | 3 ++-
> >> drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 10 +++++++++-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c | 1 +
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 1 +
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_prime.c | 1 +
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_prime.c | 1 +
> >> drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_gem_dmabuf.c | 1 +
> >> include/linux/dma-buf.h | 2 ++
> >> 8 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> [snip]
>
> >> @@ -96,6 +98,7 @@ struct dma_buf *dma_buf_export(void *priv, const struct
> >> dma_buf_ops *ops, struct file *file;
> >>
> >> if (WARN_ON(!priv || !ops
> >> + || !ops->owner
>
> Thank you for spotting this.
> I didn'y know that try_get_module returned true is module was NULL.
>
> BTW. Is it worth to add ".owner = THIS_MODULE," to all dma_buf
> exporters in this patch?

Yeah, I think that makes sense. Otherwise it might get lost somewhere,
i.e. you can smash my Ack on this.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@xxxxxxxx
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/