Re: [PATCH 0/2] ptrace: DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF fixes

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 08/07/2012 05:15 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > So I think __switch_to_extra() should set the bit before putting the
> > task on the CPU.
>
> Why?

Pardon me? __switch_to_extra() enables BTF before putting the task on
CPU. This is fine. I was trying to say that there is no need to touch
the debug register in debugger's context since __switch_to_extra() does
it.

> > If this bit is enabled on the wrong CPU then in will
> > remain set forever if single steeping has not been / will not be
> > enabled.
>
> I don't follow, could you explain in details?

The SMP case where the debugger runs on CPU0 and tracee on CPU1.
Without your "current != child" check the enable_block_step() enables
block stepping on CPU0 and switch_to_extra() on CPU1.

> Just in case, X86_EFLAGS_TF sits in task_pt_regs(next), it has no
> effect until the task returns to usermode. We only need to ensure
> DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF was set/cleared correctly when it actually returns.

Exactly. And __switch_to_extra() is perfect for the job (if we ignore
uprobes for a moment).

> Oleg.

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/