[PATCH 5/5] KVM: Replace test_and_set_bit_le() inmark_page_dirty_in_slot() with set_bit_le()

From: Takuya Yoshikawa
Date: Tue Aug 07 2012 - 07:13:01 EST


From: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Now that we have defined generic set_bit_le() we do not need to use
test_and_set_bit_le() for atomically setting a bit.

Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index a2e85af..b983f23 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -1440,8 +1440,7 @@ void mark_page_dirty_in_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
if (memslot && memslot->dirty_bitmap) {
unsigned long rel_gfn = gfn - memslot->base_gfn;

- /* TODO: introduce set_bit_le() and use it */
- test_and_set_bit_le(rel_gfn, memslot->dirty_bitmap);
+ set_bit_le(rel_gfn, memslot->dirty_bitmap);
}
}

--
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/