Re: [Regression] "x86-64/efi: Use EFI to deal with platformwall clock" prevents my machine from booting

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 07.08.12 at 11:30, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 08:14 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> That's not surprising. The question really is what goes wrong
>> when the call is being made - page fault, some other fault, or
>> silent hang. A page fault would point to an incorrect memory
>> map as the prime candidate for causing the problem. My
>> primary suspect would be #NM, i.e. the implementation using
>> floating point (SSE to be precise) instructions when they're
>> unavailable.
> 
> I managed to find a machine to reproduce this on and it looks like the
> ASUS firmware engineers are upto their old tricks of referencing
> physical addresses after we've taken control of the memory map,

Yippie. On such systems we simply can't do any runtime calls.
Should we add a command line option forcing efi_native to false,
thus suppressing all runtime calls? Or would the "noefi" one be
enough already?

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/